|
OPERATIONAL FORECASTS OF MAXIMUM
HAILSTONE DIAMETER IN MENDOZA, ARGENTINA
Julian C. Brimelow*, Terry W. Krauss**,
Gerhard W. Zeuter*
*University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
**Weather Modification Inc.Red Deer, Canada
Abstract. A coupled one-dimensional
cloud and hail growth model was used to simulate the growth of hailstones
inMendoza, Argentina. The model-derived maximum hail size forecasts
were based on 115 representative soundingsreleased during the 1999-2000
hail season. Model ensemble, persistence and subjective hail forecats
were also verified against daily observations of the maximum hall
size. The model control and ensemble showed promising skill when
forecasting the occurrence of hail as measured by the Heidkes
Skill Score (HSS--0.60). On days withsevere hall (diameter of 2
on of more), the model control forecasts showed the best skill (HSS=0.59).
The model showed improved fofecast skill when run using sounding
and surface data from the Alberta Hail Ploject. This was likely
attributable to the stringent criteria placed on the proximity soundings
and the availabifity of real-time surface data in Alberta. Although
certain cloud model parameters were useful fof inferring the potential
(and size) of hail Mendoza, the best results were achieved using
the coupled cloud and hail model. The data also suggest that theensemble
technique improves the accuracy and skill of the hail fofecasts
on some days.
ACIDIC CLOUD EPISODES IN THE NORTHERN COLORADO ROCKIES: INADVERTENT
WEATHER MODIFICATION
Edward E. Hindman*, Maria C. Meyerz*, Stanley D.
Gedzelman** and Teresa J. Bandosz***
*Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Department, The City College of
New York, New York City, NY
**Chemistry Department The City College of New York, New York City,
NY
***Geography Department, Hunter College, New York City, NY
Abstract. Acidic cloud episodes were detected in January
1998 and January 2000 at Storm PeakLaboratory (SPL) in the northern
Colorado Rockies. The episodes were characterized increased concentrations
of small droplets and condensation nucleus concentrations and reduced
liquid water contents, snowfall rates and sub-cloud relative humidities.
The trajectories of the airparcels arriving at SPL before, during
and after the episodes were studied. The parcels arrivingduring
the episodes encountered the least precipitation during their journey
to SPL suggesting little cloud and precipitation scavenging of aerosol
particles. Further, much of the difference inacidity can be explained
by dilution of the cloud droplets. Thus, the episodes may be primarily
a natural phenomenon.
Secondary Seeding as a Means of Propagating Seeding Effects
in Space and Time
William L. Woodley
Woodley Weather Consultants Littleton, Colorado
Daniel Rosenfeld
Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
Abstract: Secondary seeding, whereby unseeded clouds ingest
ice particles from cloudsthat earlier had received direct glaciogenic
(e.g., silver iodide) treatment, is hypothesized to be a possible
additional mechanism for the propagation of seeding effects in space
and time. The ingested ice particles, after experiencing some growth
in the donor cloud, act toglaciate the receptor cloud during its
active growth phase and provide it precipitation embryos. These
embryos give the new cloud a head-start on precipitation development
asthey grow further as graupel to precipitation size in the updraft
laden with high quantitiesof supercooled cloud water. This enhancement
of precipitation-forming processes is postulated to be strongest
in microphysically continental clouds in which natural andseeding-induced
primary glaciation and hydrometeor growth are slow. A case study
is presented to illustrate these processes.
ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT OF WINTER CLOUD SEEDINGIN
THE BOISE RIVER DRAINAGE, IDAHO
Don A. Griffith and Mark E. Solak
North American Weather Consultants, Inc. Sandy, UT 84070
Abstract: The Boise River Drainage, located in Central Idaho,
is productive in terms ofannual streamflow, a large majority of
which is derived from accumulated winter snow pack. There are three
dams on the upper river: Anderson Ranch, Arrowrock and Lucky Peak.
Capacities of the three reservoirs are: 413,000, 272,000 and 306,000
acre feet, respectively. Both Anderson Ranch and Lucky Peak have
hydroelectric production capabilities. Lucky Peak is located below
the first two dams. North American WeatherConsultants, Inc. conducted
winter cloud seeding programs over the Boise River Drainage above
Lucky Peak Reservoir during the water years of 1993-1996. A target/control
analysis of these four seasons of seeding indicated an average increase
in target area April lt snowwater content of 12% (an average additional
2.50" of snow water content per season). Additional analyses
were performed to estimate the potential economic benefit that mightbe
derived from the seeding program based upon the value of the estimated
increasedhydro-power production from Lucky Peak Dam. Lucky Peak
has an installed turbine capacity of 100 mw. It was estimated that
a 12% increase in April 1st snow water contentwould result in an
average 16,409 mwh of additional electricity production per year.
This amount of additional electricity was estimated to have a value
of $820,182. The average annual cost of the cloud seeding program
during the four seasons of operations was $85,000. These values
result in an average estimated benefit/cost ratio of 9.7/1. This
analysis does not consider the value of the additional electricity
produced from theAnderson Ranch Dam which is a Bureau of Reclamation
facility or the value of theenhanced streamflow to irrigation interests
downstream of the Lucky Peak Dam.
Comments on the paper by Alexis B. Long entitled"Review
of Persistence Effects of Silver Iodide Cloud Seeding"
E.K. Bigg
12 Wills Ave., Castle Hill NSW Australia 2154.
e-mail: keith @hotkey.net.au
No Abstract Available
Reply to Biggs Comments on"Review of Persistence
Effects of Silver Iodide Cloud Seeding"
Alexis B. Long
PO Box 41, 144 Jasper Road, Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia 3204
No Abstract Available
AN OKLAHOMA WEATHER MODIFICATION PROGRAMSTATUS REPORT AND
PROJECT REVIEW
Timothy E. Sedlock*, Nathan R. Kuhnert**, Rebecca
L. Resler*, Michael E. Mathis**, Bruce A. Boe*, and Brian Vance**
*Weather Modification, Inc., Fargo, North Dakota
**Oklahoma Water Resources Board, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Abstract: The recent history of the Oklahoma Weather Modification
Program (OWMP) presented, the 2001 field program summarized, and
the current status of the statewide rainfallstinmlation and hail
suppression program reported. Some suggestions for program improvementare
also enumerated.
Some Reflections on Hailstorms and Hail Suppression
Andrew G. Detwiler
Institute of Atmospheric Sciences, SDSM&T, Rapid City, SD
No Abstract Available
A REVIEW OF TIlE EDWARDS AQUIFER PRECIPITATION ENHANCEMENT
PROGRAM
Rebecca L. Resler and Bruce A. Boe
Weather Modification, Inc., Fargo, North Dakota
Abstract: The organization and facilities of the Edwards
Aquifer Precipitation EnhancementProject (EAPEP) is reviewed, and
the resources applied in the 1999, 2000, and 2001 seasons are summarized.
A preliminary evaluation of the 1999 and 2000 project seasons suggests
a 24% increase in rainfall volume for floating target units of 1,964
km^2 that actually received treatment within the Edwards Aquifer
fixed target. This corresponds to an average water increment of
626 acre-feet per unit. The full effect of seeding over the entire
target area is presently unknown. The current estimate of the benefit-to-cost
ratio is 9:1.
MENDOZA HAIL MITIGATION PROJECT(http:///www.antigranizo.com)FINAL
REPORT 2000-2001 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Terry W. Krauss and Manuel M. Mir
Weather Modification Inc. Fargo, North Dakota U.S.A., www.weathermod.com
Abstract: This report summarizes the activitiesduring the
2000-2001 field operations of the Mendoza Hail Mitigation Project.
This wasthe second year of a 5 year contract betweenWeather Modification
Inc. (WMI) of Fargo,North Dakota and the Ministry of Economy, Government
of Mendoza. The two primary objectives of the Mendoza Hail Program
areto reduce hail damage using airborne cloudseeding technology
and to implement a re-search and technology transfer program forthe
people of Argentina.
What is the actual benefit from cloud seeding?
David L. Newsom
Atmospherics Incorporated, Fresno, California
ABSTRACT: Since Vincent Schaefers Cold Box experiment
in the late 1940s, cloud seeding hasbeen used to increase
rainfall, enhance snowfall, and decrease damaging hail throughout
the world. One of the most frequent uses of cloud seeding has been
as an aid to dry land agriculture. There have been numerous programs
conducted with claims of precipitation being increased by X%, it
is often unclear whether this claimed increase applies to theentire
Target Area or whether it occurs on a more localized area. While
some portions of the Target Area will benefit greatly from seeding,
an X% increase can sometimes be aninsignificant amount of water
in relation to the entire Target Area.
Even over a relatively small area like a single county, there
will be natural variations inannual precipitation. These can be
the result of topography as well as climatological in-fluences and
these variations in precipitation can have a major impact on the
overall benefit of cloud seeding to the Target Area. However, with
digital radar systems and software, such as TITAN, Thunderstorm
Identification, Tracking And Nowcasting (Dixonand Weiner, 1993),
in use today on many of these programs, a concerted effort should
bemade to determine the actual as opposed to the assumed, benefits
from X%.
The Monterey County Weather Modification Program In California:
1991-1995
Thomas J. Henderson*, Dartanion Mires*, John R.
Stremel**, James D. Goodridge***
*Atmospherics Incorporated
**Monterey County
***California State Climatologist (ret.)
ABSTRACT: Precipitation enhancement cloud seeding program
was funded by the Monterey County WaterResources Agency, Salinas,
Caiifomia during the winter seasons of 1991 through 1995. Theoperations
were designed and conducted by Atmospherics Incorporated, Fresno,
California. Thetarget-control precipitation analyses show highly
suggestive positive results on the order of 41%more rain in the
target area than the control areas during the cloud seeding episodes.
Since only apart of the rain seasons were seeded, this represents
a 23% increase in annual precipitation overthe target area. However,
statistical tests did not provide conclusive evidence to support
theseinitial findings.
A high-level atmospheric management program plan for the
new millennium
T.P. DeFelice
No Abstract Available
Modeling TITAN control clouds
Marion Mittermaier
The Old Vicarage, Church Lane, Grazeley, Reading, RG7 1LD, UK
Dale Bates
8696 Hangar Rd.San Angelo, 76904Volume 34
Abstract: Operational programs of rain enhancement usually
face great problemsin the evaluation phase, mainly because of the
nonexistence of appropriate control clouds tomatch the seeded clouds.
TITAN is capable of proposing up to nineteen candidates for eachseeded
case, but these potential control clouds are determined using variables
rates and, there-fore, present big differences in the initial conditions.
A model (the H-model) is presented in thispaper to deal with the
size problem.
Weather Modification Scientific Management in Texas: The extensive
and intensive uses of TITAN
Dale L. Bates and Arquimedes Ruiz
Texas Weather Modification Association, San Angelo, Texas
Abstract: Nowadays Texas already has ten working operational
rain-enhancement projects, which arefocused to diminish the impact
of periodic severe droughts by using cloud seeding techniques. These
programs use TITAN and telemetry to perform and improve the operations
and the TITAN analysissoftware to assess the performance and evaluate
the results. This paper describes these uses.
|