JWM Vol. 34 Abstracts

OPERATIONAL FORECASTS OF MAXIMUM HAILSTONE DIAMETER IN MENDOZA, ARGENTINA

Julian C. Brimelow*, Terry W. Krauss**, Gerhard W. Zeuter*
*University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
**Weather Modification Inc.Red Deer, Canada

Abstract. A coupled one-dimensional cloud and hail growth model was used to simulate the growth of hailstones inMendoza, Argentina. The model-derived maximum hail size forecasts were based on 115 representative soundingsreleased during the 1999-2000 hail season. Model ensemble, persistence and subjective hail forecats were also verified against daily observations of the maximum hall size. The model control and ensemble showed promising skill when forecasting the occurrence of hail as measured by the Heidke’s Skill Score (HSS--0.60). On days withsevere hall (diameter of 2 on of more), the model control forecasts showed the best skill (HSS=0.59). The model showed improved fofecast skill when run using sounding and surface data from the Alberta Hail Ploject. This was likely attributable to the stringent criteria placed on the proximity soundings and the availabifity of real-time surface data in Alberta. Although certain cloud model parameters were useful fof inferring the potential (and size) of hail Mendoza, the best results were achieved using the coupled cloud and hail model. The data also suggest that theensemble technique improves the accuracy and skill of the hail fofecasts on some days.

ACIDIC CLOUD EPISODES IN THE NORTHERN COLORADO ROCKIES: INADVERTENT WEATHER MODIFICATION

Edward E. Hindman*, Maria C. Meyerz*, Stanley D. Gedzelman** and Teresa J. Bandosz***
*Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Department, The City College of New York, New York City, NY
**Chemistry Department The City College of New York, New York City, NY
***Geography Department, Hunter College, New York City, NY

Abstract. Acidic cloud episodes were detected in January 1998 and January 2000 at Storm PeakLaboratory (SPL) in the northern Colorado Rockies. The episodes were characterized increased concentrations of small droplets and condensation nucleus concentrations and reduced liquid water contents, snowfall rates and sub-cloud relative humidities. The trajectories of the airparcels arriving at SPL before, during and after the episodes were studied. The parcels arrivingduring the episodes encountered the least precipitation during their journey to SPL suggesting little cloud and precipitation scavenging of aerosol particles. Further, much of the difference inacidity can be explained by dilution of the cloud droplets. Thus, the episodes may be primarily a natural phenomenon.

Secondary Seeding as a Means of Propagating Seeding Effects in Space and Time

William L. Woodley
Woodley Weather Consultants Littleton, Colorado
Daniel Rosenfeld
Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

Abstract: Secondary seeding, whereby unseeded clouds ingest ice particles from cloudsthat earlier had received direct glaciogenic (e.g., silver iodide) treatment, is hypothesized to be a possible additional mechanism for the propagation of seeding effects in space and time. The ingested ice particles, after experiencing some growth in the donor cloud, act toglaciate the receptor cloud during its active growth phase and provide it precipitation embryos. These embryos give the new cloud a head-start on precipitation development asthey grow further as graupel to precipitation size in the updraft laden with high quantitiesof supercooled cloud water. This enhancement of precipitation-forming processes is postulated to be strongest in microphysically continental clouds in which natural andseeding-induced primary glaciation and hydrometeor growth are slow. A case study is presented to illustrate these processes.

ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT OF WINTER CLOUD SEEDINGIN THE BOISE RIVER DRAINAGE, IDAHO

Don A. Griffith and Mark E. Solak
North American Weather Consultants, Inc. Sandy, UT 84070

Abstract: The Boise River Drainage, located in Central Idaho, is productive in terms ofannual streamflow, a large majority of which is derived from accumulated winter snow pack. There are three dams on the upper river: Anderson Ranch, Arrowrock and Lucky Peak. Capacities of the three reservoirs are: 413,000, 272,000 and 306,000 acre feet, respectively. Both Anderson Ranch and Lucky Peak have hydroelectric production capabilities. Lucky Peak is located below the first two dams. North American WeatherConsultants, Inc. conducted winter cloud seeding programs over the Boise River Drainage above Lucky Peak Reservoir during the water years of 1993-1996. A target/control analysis of these four seasons of seeding indicated an average increase in target area April lt snowwater content of 12% (an average additional 2.50" of snow water content per season). Additional analyses were performed to estimate the potential economic benefit that mightbe derived from the seeding program based upon the value of the estimated increasedhydro-power production from Lucky Peak Dam. Lucky Peak has an installed turbine capacity of 100 mw. It was estimated that a 12% increase in April 1st snow water contentwould result in an average 16,409 mwh of additional electricity production per year. This amount of additional electricity was estimated to have a value of $820,182. The average annual cost of the cloud seeding program during the four seasons of operations was $85,000. These values result in an average estimated benefit/cost ratio of 9.7/1. This analysis does not consider the value of the additional electricity produced from theAnderson Ranch Dam which is a Bureau of Reclamation facility or the value of theenhanced streamflow to irrigation interests downstream of the Lucky Peak Dam.

Comments on the paper by Alexis B. Long entitled"Review of Persistence Effects of Silver Iodide Cloud Seeding"

E.K. Bigg
12 Wills Ave., Castle Hill NSW Australia 2154.
e-mail: keith @hotkey.net.au

No Abstract Available

Reply to Bigg’s Comments on"Review of Persistence Effects of Silver Iodide Cloud Seeding"

Alexis B. Long
PO Box 41, 144 Jasper Road, Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia 3204

No Abstract Available

AN OKLAHOMA WEATHER MODIFICATION PROGRAMSTATUS REPORT AND PROJECT REVIEW

Timothy E. Sedlock*, Nathan R. Kuhnert**, Rebecca L. Resler*, Michael E. Mathis**, Bruce A. Boe*, and Brian Vance**
*Weather Modification, Inc., Fargo, North Dakota
**Oklahoma Water Resources Board, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Abstract: The recent history of the Oklahoma Weather Modification Program (OWMP) presented, the 2001 field program summarized, and the current status of the statewide rainfallstinmlation and hail suppression program reported. Some suggestions for program improvementare also enumerated.

Some Reflections on Hailstorms and Hail Suppression

Andrew G. Detwiler
Institute of Atmospheric Sciences, SDSM&T, Rapid City, SD

No Abstract Available

A REVIEW OF TIlE EDWARDS AQUIFER PRECIPITATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

Rebecca L. Resler and Bruce A. Boe
Weather Modification, Inc., Fargo, North Dakota

Abstract: The organization and facilities of the Edwards Aquifer Precipitation EnhancementProject (EAPEP) is reviewed, and the resources applied in the 1999, 2000, and 2001 seasons are summarized. A preliminary evaluation of the 1999 and 2000 project seasons suggests a 24% increase in rainfall volume for floating target units of 1,964 km^2 that actually received treatment within the Edwards Aquifer fixed target. This corresponds to an average water increment of 626 acre-feet per unit. The full effect of seeding over the entire target area is presently unknown. The current estimate of the benefit-to-cost ratio is 9:1.

MENDOZA HAIL MITIGATION PROJECT(http:///www.antigranizo.com)FINAL REPORT 2000-2001 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Terry W. Krauss and Manuel M. Mir
Weather Modification Inc. Fargo, North Dakota U.S.A., www.weathermod.com

Abstract: This report summarizes the activitiesduring the 2000-2001 field operations of the Mendoza Hail Mitigation Project. This wasthe second year of a 5 year contract betweenWeather Modification Inc. (WMI) of Fargo,North Dakota and the Ministry of Economy, Government of Mendoza. The two primary objectives of the Mendoza Hail Program areto reduce hail damage using airborne cloudseeding technology and to implement a re-search and technology transfer program forthe people of Argentina.

What is the actual benefit from cloud seeding?

David L. Newsom
Atmospherics Incorporated, Fresno, California

ABSTRACT: Since Vincent Schaefer’s Cold Box experiment in the late 1940’s, cloud seeding hasbeen used to increase rainfall, enhance snowfall, and decrease damaging hail throughout the world. One of the most frequent uses of cloud seeding has been as an aid to dry land agriculture. There have been numerous programs conducted with claims of precipitation being increased by X%, it is often unclear whether this claimed increase applies to theentire Target Area or whether it occurs on a more localized area. While some portions of the Target Area will benefit greatly from seeding, an X% increase can sometimes be aninsignificant amount of water in relation to the entire Target Area.

Even over a relatively small area like a single county, there will be natural variations inannual precipitation. These can be the result of topography as well as climatological in-fluences and these variations in precipitation can have a major impact on the overall benefit of cloud seeding to the Target Area. However, with digital radar systems and software, such as TITAN, Thunderstorm Identification, Tracking And Nowcasting (Dixonand Weiner, 1993), in use today on many of these programs, a concerted effort should bemade to determine the actual as opposed to the assumed, benefits from X%.

The Monterey County Weather Modification Program In California:
1991-1995

Thomas J. Henderson*, Dartanion Mires*, John R. Stremel**, James D. Goodridge***
*Atmospherics Incorporated
**Monterey County
***California State Climatologist (ret.)

ABSTRACT: Precipitation enhancement cloud seeding program was funded by the Monterey County WaterResources Agency, Salinas, Caiifomia during the winter seasons of 1991 through 1995. Theoperations were designed and conducted by Atmospherics Incorporated, Fresno, California. Thetarget-control precipitation analyses show highly suggestive positive results on the order of 41%more rain in the target area than the control areas during the cloud seeding episodes. Since only apart of the rain seasons were seeded, this represents a 23% increase in annual precipitation overthe target area. However, statistical tests did not provide conclusive evidence to support theseinitial findings.

A high-level atmospheric management program plan for the new millennium

T.P. DeFelice

No Abstract Available

Modeling TITAN control clouds

Marion Mittermaier
The Old Vicarage, Church Lane, Grazeley, Reading, RG7 1LD, UK
Dale Bates
8696 Hangar Rd.San Angelo, 76904Volume 34

Abstract: Operational programs of rain enhancement usually face great problemsin the evaluation phase, mainly because of the nonexistence of appropriate control clouds tomatch the seeded clouds. TITAN is capable of proposing up to nineteen candidates for eachseeded case, but these potential control clouds are determined using variables rates and, there-fore, present big differences in the initial conditions. A model (the H-model) is presented in thispaper to deal with the size problem.

Weather Modification Scientific Management in Texas: The extensive and intensive uses of TITAN

Dale L. Bates and Arquimedes Ruiz
Texas Weather Modification Association, San Angelo, Texas

Abstract: Nowadays Texas already has ten working operational rain-enhancement projects, which arefocused to diminish the impact of periodic severe droughts by using cloud seeding techniques. These programs use TITAN and telemetry to perform and improve the operations and the TITAN analysissoftware to assess the performance and evaluate the results. This paper describes these uses.