|
Background
It has been established that certain aspects of the weather, specifically
cloud microphysical and precipitation processes, can be intentionally
modified under various circumstances. Beneficial effects, those
in which favorable benefit/cost ratios are realized without producing
any detrimental environmental impacts, can be achieved within each
of the major categories of cloud modification using existing treatment
(cloud seeding) methodologies. The magnitudes and temporal/spatial
scales of seeding effects vary between and within those major categories.
It has also been established that unintentional anthropogenic effects
(those caused by human activity) on weather do occur, and are commonly
referred to as inadvertent weather modification. These inadvertent
effects can be manifested by modifications to air quality, temperatures,
and precipitation patterns and intensities. The precipitation effects
can be positive or negative.
Increasing demands are being placed upon existing fresh water
supplies throughout the world. These increasing demands lead to
greater sensitivity to drought and to even moderate precipitation
shortfalls. Recent investigations indicate negative impacts of air
pollution on precipitation downwind of some industrialized areas
and areas that practice open burning of vegetation. Concerns about
water supplies are producing increasing interest in the application
of cloud seeding for precipitation augmentation. Hail damage to
crops and property and fog-induced problems continue to produce
interest in their mitigation. These factors, combined with the typically
attractive benefit/cost ratios associated with operational seeding
programs, have fostered ongoing and growing interest in intentional
weather modification.
Brief capability statements regarding intentional weather modification
by cloud seeding follow, summarizing the current state of the technology
within its primary application categories. The summaries are limited
to conventional seeding methods that are based on accepted physical
principles. A more detailed treatment of weather modification capabilities
and the status of the discipline can be found in Volume 36 (2004)
of the WMA Journal in a review panel report: The Weather Modification
Association Response to the National Research Council's Report Titled
"Critical Issues in Weather Modification Research." A
word of caution is necessary concerning these generalized capability
statements, specifically regarding the transferability of results.
Regional differences in cloud microphysics, atmospheric temperature
structure, frequency of seedable cloud system occurrence, orographic
influences, seeding agent selection, delivery and dosage rates,
and quality and completeness of operational execution can alter
these expectations.
The potential environmental impacts of cloud seeding have been
addressed in many studies. No significant adverse environmental
impacts have been found due to use of silver iodide, the most commonly
used seeding material, even in project areas where seeding has been
conducted for fifty years or more.
Fog and Stratus Dispersal
The dispersal of shallow, supercooled (colder than 0o C) fog or
stratus cloud decks is an established operational technology. The
effects from dispersing supercooled fog and stratus are easily measured
and the results highly predictable. Hence, randomized statistical
verification has generally been considered unnecessary.
Dispensing ice phase seeding agents, such as dry ice, liquid nitrogen,
liquid propane or silver iodide into supercooled fog and stratus
is effective in improving visibility. Clearings established in cloud
decks embedded in strong wind fields fill in quickly unless seeding
is done nearly continuously. Selection of a suitable technique is
dependent upon wind, temperature and other factors. Dry
ice has commonly been used in airborne delivery systems. Liquid
carbon dioxide, liquid nitrogen
and liquid propane have been used in
ground-based delivery systems at some airports.
The dispersal of warm (warmer than 0o C) fog or stratus decks
over areas as large as airport runways has been operationally applied
via introduction of a significant heat source. The mixing of drier
air into shallow fog by helicopter downwash
can create localized clearings. Various hygroscopic (water attracting)
substances have also been used to improve visibility in these situations,
primarily in military applications.
Winter Precipitation Augmentation
The capability to increase precipitation from wintertime orographic
cloud systems has now been demonstrated successfully in numerous
"links in the chain" research experiments. The evolution,
growth and fallout of seeding-induced (and enhanced) ice particles
have been documented in several mountainous regions of the western
U. S. Enhanced precipitation rates in seeded cloud regions have
been measured in the range of hundredths to >1 mm per hour. Although
conducted over smaller temporal and spatial scales, research results
tend to be consistent with evaluations of randomized experiments
and a substantial and growing number of operational programs where
5% - 15% increases in seasonal precipitation have been consistently
reported. Similar results have been found in both continental and
coastal regions, with the potential for enhanced precipitation in
coastal regions appearing to be greater in convective cloud regimes.
The consistent range of indicated effects in many regions suggests
fairly widespread transferability of the estimated results.
Technological advances have aided winter precipitation augmentation
programs. Fast-acting silver iodide ice nuclei, with higher activity
at warmer temperatures, have increased the capability to augment
precipitation in shallow orographic cloud systems. Numerical modeling
has improved the understanding of atmospheric transport processes
and allowed simulation of the meteorological and microphysical processes
involved in cloud seeding. Improvements in computer and communications
systems have resulted in a steady improvement in remotely controlled
cloud (ice) nuclei generators (CNG's), which permit improved placement
of CNG's in remote mountainous locations.
Wintertime snowfall augmentation programs can use a combination
of aircraft and ground-based dispersing systems. Although silver
iodide compounds are still the most commonly used glaciogenic
(causing the formation of ice) seeding agents, dry ice is used in
some warmer (but still supercooled) cloud situations. Liquid
propane also shows some promise as a seeding agent when dispensers
can be positioned above the freezing level on the upwind slopes
of mountains at locations adequately far upwind to allow growth
and fallout of precipitation within the intended target areas. Dry
ice and liquid propane expand the window of opportunity for seeding
over that of silver iodide, since they can produce ice particles
at temperatures as warm as -0.5o C... For effective precipitation
augmentation, seeding methods and guidelines need to be adapted
to regional meteorological and topographical situations.
Although traditional statistical methods continue to be used to
evaluate both randomized and non-randomized wintertime precipitation
augmentation programs, the results of similar programs are also
being pooled objectively in order to obtain more robust estimates
of seeding efficacy. Objective evaluations of non-randomized operational
programs continue to be a difficult challenge. Some new methods
of evaluation using the trace chemical and physical properties of
segmented snow profiles show considerable promise as possible means
of quantifying precipitation augmentation over basin-sized target
areas.
Summer Precipitation Augmentation
The capability to augment summer precipitation from convective
clouds has been reasonably well demonstrated. Assessments of some
operational and research programs that have seeded selected individual
clouds or clusters of clouds with either glaciogenic
or hygroscopic nuclei have found that seeded
clouds tend to last longer, expand or travel farther to cover larger
areas, and are more likely to merge with nearby clouds and produce
more precipitation. Both dynamic and microphysical changes appear
to be involved.
Results from research programs conducted on summertime cumulus
clouds are encouraging but somewhat variable. Part of the resulting
uncertainty is due to the variety of climatological and microphysical
settings in which experimentation has been conducted. Other important
factors include the spatial scale at which the investigations are
conducted and the seeding mode. Projects which relied upon introduction
of glaciogenic seeding material targeted for specific clouds or
portions of clouds that met certain criteria (based essentially
upon the stage of development of the clouds) have generally indicated
positive seeding effects, ranging between 50% and 100% for individual
clouds and on the order of 50% for clusters of convective clouds.
Evaluations of operationally conducted summer precipitation augmentation
programs present a difficult problem due to their non-randomized
nature and the normally large temporal and spatial variability present
in summertime rainfall. Recognizing these evaluation limitations,
various methods for the evaluation of such programs have been developed
and used, ranging in scale from individual clouds to floating targets
of varying sizes to area-wide analyses. The results of many of these
evaluations, at the single cloud scale through floating target areas
up to 1,700 km2 have indicated a positive seeding effect in precipitation.
Area-wide effects can be more difficult to discern due to the large
temporal and spatial variability in summertime rainfall noted earlier.
In some instances, apparent positive effects of seeding have also
been noted outside the specific targets. Thus, the apparent effect
of seeding is not necessarily confined to the directly-treated clouds.
The physical mechanisms leading to those effects outside the directly-treated
clouds are not yet fully understood.
Technological advances have aided summer precipitation augmentation
programs. These include fast-acting silver iodide ice nuclei, new
hygroscopic seeding formulations, sophisticated radar and satellite
data processing and analysis capabilities, airborne cloud physics
instrumentation and continued improvements in numerical modeling.
Hail Suppression
The capability to suppress damaging hail continues to improve.
Attracted by potentially large benefit-to-cost ratios, many countries
are conducting programs where hailstorms are seeded to reduce the
damage caused by hail. While there are a number of concepts regarding
the formation and mitigation of hail, the most common treatment
method for hail suppression involves the addition of high concentrations
of ice nuclei (usually silver iodide smoke particles) into the new
growth regions of storms from aircraft or ground-based sources to
manipulate the hail embryo formation process and thus limit the
growth of hailstones.
Evaluations of carefully conducted hail suppression operations
have demonstrated a reduction in damage caused by hail to agricultural
crops and property. Studies of long-standing hail suppression operations
in a number of locations around the world indicate a range of effects
from 25% to 75% reduction in damage. Advances in radar data processing
and evaluation techniques are helping to provide additional insights
into the effects of seeding. Microphysical measurements from single-cloud
studies and radar analyses are also providing encouraging evidence
consistent with the conceptual models of hail suppression. These
technological advances and research efforts continue to develop
improved understanding of hail growth and hail suppression.
The Weather Modification Association does not endorse the use of
hail cannons. To date there is a lack of what the Association considers
to be any scientific evidence that hail cannons
produce an effect on thunderstorms' ability to produce hailstones,
including the reduction of damaging hail from those storms. Furthermore,
there is no scientifically based expectation that this method will
work. This statement is consistent with the World Meteorological
Organization's published position on the use of hail cannons to
suppress hail.
Status of the Discipline
The fundamental principles and primary cloud treatment strategies
involved in weather modification are reasonably well understood
and a substantial body of evidence regarding the effectiveness of
cloud seeding exists. Attainment of desirable weather modification
effects depends upon several factors, including the weather regimes
of a specific area and their meteorological characteristics, the
design of a program to achieve a specified goal, and the execution
of the program.
The "level of evidence" issue regarding weather modification
effectiveness remains a topic of some debate. An increasing number
of cloud seeding practitioners, sponsors and investigators accept
the growing body of primarily statistically expressed, but also
objective physical evidence in support of cloud seeding for beneficial
effects. The ranges of effects shown in this Capability Statement
take into account a) the statistically significant results of some
carefully controlled, randomized experiments, b) the physical evidence
obtained through laboratory and atmospheric experimentation and
observation and c) the results of less robust statistical evaluations
of large numbers of non-randomized cloud seeding projects over decades.
It remains to those considering application of cloud seeding technologies
to determine what level of evidence is appropriate for their decision
making.
Persisting challenges in weather modification include determining
and defining the conditions under which predictable and consistent
effects may be achieved, and establishing and executing the most
effective cloud treatment strategies. It also appears that, in some
situations, air pollution effects on precipitation can confound
estimation of the effectiveness of cloud seeding, such that the
potential for pollution effects should be considered in the design,
execution and evaluation of cloud seeding programs. It is also important
to continue the development and application of methods for estimating
the effectiveness of weather modification projects, especially operational
projects conducted without randomization. Continued applied research
into weather modification issues is encouraged. Incremental advances
in the science and technology of weather modification will lead
to improvements in cloud seeding opportunity recognition, treatment
strategies and methods for evaluating cloud seeding effectiveness.
Such advances will lead toward eventual optimization and broader
acceptance of cloud seeding applications and, thus, fuller realization
of the potential of this technology.
|